/ Forside/ Interesser / Dyr / Andre dyr / Spørgsmål
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Andre dyr
#NavnPoint
dova 3503
refi 1360
Nordsted1 1303
molokyle 930
granner01 770
valde. 763
dabj 725
pifo 705
ans 596
10  HelleBirg.. 552
Harpy
Fra : Dartagnan
Vist : 662 gange
10 point
Dato : 15-04-02 10:41

Jeg vil bare spørge om der er nogen der har en go side hvor man ka finde nogle oplysninger om Harpy (ørnen) Jeg har nemlig søgt på Google og en masse andre sider, og det har ik rigtig været til den helt storer hjælp.
Oplysningerne må godt være om hvor gamle de ka blive, hvor stort vingefang, og en masse andre oplysninger.

Mange tak på forhånd

Dartagnan

 
 
Kommentar
Fra : dimmerdk


Dato : 15-04-02 12:09

Jeg har fundet en engelsksproget side...

der står bl.a. and have a wingspread of about 2 m (about 7 ft). Males are smaller....

http://library.thinkquest.org/11922/birds/eagle.htm

side nr. 3 hvis du søger på google med følgende ord:Harpy eagle size wingspan

Accepteret svar
Fra : zonker

Modtaget 10 point
Dato : 15-04-02 21:12

Jeg faldt over følgende :

Fra:Christopher Majka (nextug@ac.dal.ca)
Emne:Big Birds
Nyhedsgruppe:rec.birds
View this article only
Dato:1993-09-04 23:59:08 PST


My apologies if any of this material has appeared before. Our mailer's
connections with Usenet have been exceedingly erratic for the past 3-4
weeks and most of the material I posted during that time got lost in the
Internet ozone.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Joe.Morlan@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org. writes:

> Andean Condor is probably the heaviest and Wandering Albatross reportedly has
> the longest wings.

To repost this information yet again:

The California Condor (Vultur californianus) has a wingspan of 3.05 m
(120 inches). The Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) is the same. The latter
is probably heavier weighing in at up to 11kg (24.3 lbs).

The two largest albatrosses are the Wandering Albatross (Diomeda exulans)
and the Royal Albatross (Diomedea epomophora). Both have wingspans of
3.3 m (130 inches). The Amsterdam Albatross (Diomedea amsterdamensis) is
slightly smaller.

Continuing the thread andrewt@cse.unsw.edu.au (Andrew Taylor) writes:

> If you are being picky shouldn't the Amsterdam Albatross join the tie?

I'm no expert on this, however, Peter Harrison in his Field Guide to the
Seabirds of the World (1987) gives no morphometric data on the Amsterdam
Albatross and writes:

"Recently discovered species, perhaps averaging slightly smaller overall
than Wandering Albatross."

He follows Roux, J.P., Jouventin, P., Mougin, J.L., Stahl, J.C., & Weimerskirch,
H. (1983) Oiseau 53, 1:1-11 in which the preliminary accounts of
the species was published. His superb book Seabirds: An indentification Guide
(1983) which has detailed descriptions and morphometric information was
published before the Amsterdam Albatross had been described.
Perhaps some pelagic ornithologists on rec.birds have more recent information?

Other large neotropical flying birds include the Central American Jabiru (Jabiru
mycteria), a big stork standing 1.35 m (53") and weighing up to 6.5 kg. and the
splendid and unfortunately rare Harpy Eagle (Harpia harpyja). Females are 1.07 m
long and can weight up to a whopping 7.5 kg. (males are smaller,
weighing in at 4.5 kg).

The male Greater Rhea's (Rhea americana), a flightless bird which stands 1.4 m
(53") tall, can weigh in at up to 25 kg (55) lbs making it perhaps the heaviest
neotropical bird.
Læs resten af denne besked... (76 linier mere)

Message 2 in thread
Fra:Christopher Majka (nextug@ac.dal.ca)
Emne:Re: Big Birds
Nyhedsgruppe:rec.birds
View this article only
Dato:1993-09-10 16:36:30 PST



In a post entitle Big Birds I, <nextug@ac.dal.ca> (Christopher Majka), wrote:

> Past eras featured some really massive birds such as Teratornis merriami
> from the Pleistocene in California which had a wingspan of 5.7 m (12') or
> Osteodontornis orri from the Miocence in California which had a wingspan of
> more than 7.6 m (16') -- more than twice the span of a Wandering Albatross!

Thanks to Bob McKay <rim@csadfa.cs.adfa.oz.au> for pointing out that the metric
and Imperial units do not match (can't understand what happened there; it
wasn't even late at night that I was composing this post!). For the record, the
Imperial units are correct. Thus the paragraph should read:

Past eras featured some really massive birds such as Teratornis merriami
from the Pleistocene in California which had a wingspan of 3.7 m (12') or
Osteodontornis orri from the Miocence in California which had a wingspan of
more than 4.9 m (16').

In the course of ferreting around I discovered what may be a contender for the
the largest flying bird of all time. H. Howard (1952) in an article entitled:
Preghistoric Avifauna of Smith Creek Cave, Nevada, with a description of a
new gigantic raptor (Bull. So. Calif. Acad. Sci 51:50:54) formally describes
Teratornis incredibilis, a Quaternary vulture which may have had a wingspan
of 5.2 m (17') just edging out Osteodontornis orri (a toothed seabird if I
recall correctly, descibed by Howard himself later in 1957)!

Anyone else have any more massive contenders?

Cheers!

Christopher Majka
Message 3 in thread
Fra:Bob Becker (bob@becker.org)
Emne:Big Birds
Nyhedsgruppe:rec.birds
View this article only
Dato:2002-03-14 07:11:11 PST


We just had a flock of four wild turkeys
wander up the driveway, past the barn,
and into the woods.

They are quite magnificent birds, and
their iridescent plumage in the morning
sunlight was very striking.
Message 4 in thread
Fra:KrisHur (nospam@notme.com)
Emne:Re: Big Birds
Nyhedsgruppe:rec.birds
View this article only
Dato:2002-03-14 10:00:28 PST


FYI, Benjamin Franklin wanted to make the Turkey our national bird instead
of the bald eagle.


"Bob Becker" <bob@becker.org> wrote in message
news:243k8.459185$eS3.34942461@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> We just had a flock of four wild turkeys
> wander up the driveway, past the barn,
> and into the woods.
>
> They are quite magnificent birds, and
> their iridescent plumage in the morning
> sunlight was very striking.
>
>
>


Godkendelse af svar
Fra : Dartagnan


Dato : 16-04-02 10:22

Mange tak zonker, det hjalp lidt. Men det ville havde været bedre hvis det havde været på dansk.
                        

Du har følgende muligheder
Eftersom du ikke er logget ind i systemet, kan du ikke skrive et indlæg til dette spørgsmål.

Hvis du ikke allerede er registreret, kan du gratis blive medlem, ved at trykke på "Bliv medlem" ude i menuen.
Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177414
Tips : 31962
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6407849
Brugere : 218876

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste